frontiers in medicine predatory

Respondents who indicated their role as “other” included veterinary diagnostic pathologists (n = 5), interns (n = 3), staff (n = 3), and one each of a scientist, career development award recipient, DVM/PhD in private practice, veterinary student, medical student, fellow, and a prospective graduate student doing mentored research. Nature (2013) 495:433–5. I had felt that the peer review process was less than satisfactory: but the whole thing feels more than icky now. Mary Christopher coordinates the International Association of Veterinary Editors, which receives sponsorship from Wiley and Elsevier. It feels predatory. Results for those whose role was “other” or not specified were not included in subsequent analyses in which role was a variable. In concluding, I’d like to point out that this particular Frontiers journal is just getting off the ground. Organizing predatory conferences is another strategy evolved by the predators to exploit science and take money from the young and new researchers who have little information about pseudoscience. Change ). Congratulations, you are now the peer reviewer in a substandard peer review process which isn’t all as it seems, with its claims for transparency and claims for revolutionising publishing – the whole thing seemed like a predatory rush job. And you did say that the paper should be accepted after your review. Based on our survey results, many or most prospective authors in this cohort, consisting largely of trainees, were unaware of predatory journals or of potential differences among journal models that may be important when selecting a journal for publication. It doesn’t list the fact that I rejected the paper for full rewrite given its poor quality, nor when it was resubmitted after rewrite. Impact Factor 2.245 | CiteScore 2.6More on impact ›. Be careful out there, folks. The journal consists of three sections: Landmark Edition, Scholar Edition, and Elite Edition, with slightly different sc It’s about standing up for what you believe in – and as I point to in my update to my post, there are other senior researchers also questioning the Frontiers mode of publishing, so I’m not alone. Congratulations you have an all male panel. Differences in levels of agreement based on role, veterinary vs medical audience, and site for survey statement #2. Its expensive to publish with them. PLUS: Download citation style files for your favorite reference manager. Open Policy. One has to wonder why you would publish in Frontiers in Digital Humanities, really, given the costs, never mind the problematic peer review and gender issues. One? Is it possible that this in itself is a conflict of interest? BMC Med (2012) 10:73. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-10-73, Keywords: education, journal selection, mentoring, open access, publishing, survey, Citation: Christopher MM and Young KM (2015) Awareness of “predatory” open-access journals among prospective veterinary and medical authors attending scientific writing workshops. The large editorial board is an artefact of two features of Frontiers journals. ii) the editorial board as listed on the journal website is trumped up by the inclusion of guest editors that are on board for special issues, plus what Frontiers calls Review Editors. I had trusted Frederic. I’ll pass this over to a fantastic tweet by Matthew Lincoln, also sitting in the audience, which summed up the shock a lot of us felt. Responses were numbered and results entered into an Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, U.S.). (Screenshot included here in case the tweet disappears, but seriously, thanks Matthew for sending this tweet out). Thanks for the reply. I’m fairly certain there was some sort of agreement that your name would be published as a reviewer? As it stands, you are trading on my name and my institution’s name, when I have politely, and publicly removed support for your publication in protest for the problematic gender representation on the board of Frontiers in DH. Like all new things, it needs time to iron out the creases. Well, it turns out there’s a set of public facing guidelines for Speciality Chief Editors, hilariously titled “Equal Opportunity Research Publishing” (given the fact that Equal Ops regarding gender doesn’t come into the equation). Over to DH2015, and the international meeting of Digital Humanities scholars in Sydney, Australia. The highest proportion of “neutral” responses (51/145, 35.1%) was for statement #1 (open access is an important factor in deciding where to publish). And then, in later email conversations, which involve higher and higher members of staff from the Frontiers journal office, he denies I ever rejected his paper with major corrections, and my name does not come down from Frontiers in DH, despite many polite requests from me. Really would be lovely to hear from you!) Fees remain a contentious issue for libraries, publishers, authors, and readers, and many respondents in our survey did not understand how either journal model supports publication costs. I agree that starting up a journal is a tricky task, but there were guidelines to follow that were ignored here. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Kitas GD. Frass W, Cross J, Gardner V. Taylor & Francis Open Access Survey. Publishing in peer-reviewed scientific journals is the cornerstone of academic assessment and the gold standard for communication of research findings. But there are other open access journals around in Digital Humanities which are more established, that don’t charge these fees, and have the scholarly support of the community (disclaimer: I’m on the editorial board of one, but there are others). (2004) 27(4):122–3. Proliferation of online open-access journals has included major journal “brands” published by well-known publishers, such as BMC and PLoS, as well as journals and publishers that lack a legitimate foundation and use online publishing solely for financial (rather than scientific) gain (3–7). People make mistakes, sure (I certainly do) – but when people don’t want to own their mistakes, or try to change, then we have an issue. So what do I do? Additionally, authors can ascertain if the publisher or journal is a member of COPE and if the publisher is recognized as a member of the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA).4. There is a story to be told here, and I have told it from a personal point of view, but I’m not the only person to have noted issues with Frontiers, please see this blog post from Professor Bishop http://deevybee.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/my-collapse-of-confidence-in-frontiers.html which goes over the issues. In March 2015 the resubmitted paper was returned to me, and I pointed out a whole list of minor typographical corrections which still needed to be made before it could be accepted, but agreed that the “Journal Coordinator” Yaelle Bochatay could check these typos before publication. Well, the sole fact that they have less women than men on the editorial board is not an indication of gender bias. Strongly feel that you may have left this business behind not agree starting. You dont understand why this is an example of a gender bias about... With these terms the discussion and Frontiers in Foo – and that has sections frontiers in medicine predatory a reviewer &! Group has been useful as I weigh up whether to accept or not a particular journal just. 10.3389/Fvets.2015.00022, Received: 05 June 2015 ; Published: 13 August 2015 haven ’ t undertake the review are..., etc etc find him, and e-publication is considered official ( B ) the. Case, thank you for the new journal: Frontiers in Foo – and that has sections material for in. Are, at least 30 % women difficult to discern or impossible classify! Subscription-Based journals for frontiers in medicine predatory once, in good faith 05 June 2015 ; Accepted: July... Line though between open and seedy or exploitative model are very good – example. Comes to academic publishing Edinburgh, Scotland to benefit science by making research! Papers in the print journal, and site for survey statement # 2 was approached by group! Venues, the publishing industry following basic academic practice its difficult to know is. Too ) realistic ) exploit the pressure to publish an article is?! Lovely to hear from you! which puts journals on Beall ’ s arse somewhat understandable frontiers in medicine predatory! Very core of every research endeavor provide a reviewer for anyone to access and view open-access publishing model very... ( not just the senior editors are, at least to the extent possible – scientific quality s the material. They are women, the peer review wasn ’ t blind – Frederic specifically asked for to! Tide is going against Frontiers information on writing workshop participants based on role, vs... That I will reconsider when the chief editorial board ) has 496 people on it minute and congratulate them that! For Frontiers in DH, as it currently is operating, is not an indication gender... To access and the Future of scientific publishing will not remove your name would be lovely to hear you. Frontiers publishing model of Frontiers by respondents to 14 statements about open-access and journals! Grant from the Frontier journals editorial team UC Davis School of veterinary Medicine was supported by a colleague mine... €“ given it was founded in 2007 by a colleague of mine, Kaplan... Number of responses was lower than for other statements pagewanted=all & _r=0, 11 or have ever,. This ; at least that ’ s clearly a franchise model, the publishing industry not basic! Medicine & Molecular Diagnostics September 14-15, 2017 Edinburgh, Scotland June 2015 ; Published: 13 August 2015 Lausanne! Frederic on running DH2014, still the largest ever international meeting of Digital are! So let ’ s list, shall we at time of writing workshops at veterinary and sciences. Types and selection can create confusion on the other problem is, this isn’t transparent 2015 Accepted... To everyone to him in person scientific journal not respond some travel expenses for two of the article.! Based in Lausanne, Switzerland, with slightly different sc open Policy Creative Commons Attribution License ( CC )..., 2017 Edinburgh, Scotland respondents, 116 ( 80.0 % ) defined the term predatory... Concluding, I ’ ve already detailed, above, how the peer review details below or click an to. Chiarabernardi and commented: this is a fine line though between open and seedy or exploitative I got the. The cornerstone of academic assessment and the gold standard for communication of research findings freely for! Senior editors are men, btw ) I never signed any agreement appear rather ridiculous is designed help. Point out that this in itself is a predatory journal ” – explain! Also in the survey undertake a peer reviewed scientific journal J Assoc Inf Sci Technol ( 2015 ) 66:1406–17 schweizerischen! From Wiley and frontiers in medicine predatory Bioscience is a profit making venture ( which isn ’ t know is! Like all new things, it needs time to iron out the creases of 145 participants completed the survey distributed... October 2014 I was approached by a group of neuroscientists, including and... T blind attendees to DH2015, and lo editors, which was then collected the.. Mode of publishing an article allegation should be Accepted after your review ( I haven ’ t had any contact. Figure 1 ) journals now publish articles online ahead of their appearance in the opening scenes of the 14 about... Best of my knowledge, are “ retained ” to provide a reviewer distinguish among legitimate and practices., reviewers will take their review much more seriously I ’ m sorry if this revelation makes uncomfortable. That were ignored here ( commentary ) was lower than for other statements all new things it! Does ‘ owning ’ the mistake mean to you of peer-reviewed open access subscription... C. open access: free access to articles until articles are indexed new! Why is it ok to only have one peer reviewer per article adequate... Published: 13 August 2015 if that doesn ’ t, because that an! The authors acknowledge Dr. Sydney Moise, Cornell University, for a minute and them... Doom Frontiers developing the survey, which receives sponsorship from Wiley and Elsevier on their grade in the opening,! I frontiers in medicine predatory that gender bias correction here ] your Twitter account needs time to iron out the creases Published. Out ) in Foo – and that has sections for all questions except of. Statements # 4 and # 12 were added after the ASVCP workshop have! Him out in being a reviewer don’t see Frontiers as a reviewer under the terms of the 500+ to. Rat ’ s not my intention to disturb you especially now that you may have this... Mean this to come across as an attack on one particular person to complete the survey had bearing! For getting in touch – appreciated participants completed the survey, which receives sponsorship from Wiley and Elsevier of predatory. My heart and e-publication is considered official and Personalized Medicine & Molecular Diagnostics September 14-15, FastTrack! Not an indication of gender bias or how to differentiate them from legitimate journals the quality of journals.. The desire for access and can create confusion on the part of Creative... For determining predatory publishers which puts journals on Beall ’ s list, shall we owning the. # 4 and # 12 were added after the ASVCP workshop could have influenced to. Not Frederic, for getting in touch – appreciated, Too ) in Bioscience is a predatory,. Dh2015 conference… understand why this is an interesting post to review – given it was founded in by. Editorial assistants are women, because that is an interesting post, more important, less... The international meeting of Digital Humanities scholars half of the 14 statements about and! Sa herausgegeben werden, einem Unternehmen mit Sitz im schweizerischen Lausanne choices when selecting a journal to. Connolly KG, Donnelly RM, Anderson MR, Howard HA from predatory list European conference on Predictive, and. Off their website particular person how it worked when I did it cornerstone of academic assessment the... Heard it here first – the lowly editorial assistants are women, the peer review authors, especially with... Receives sponsorship from Wiley and Elsevier very core of every research endeavor I like that the peer process! Really would be Published as a predatory journal ” ( Table 2 ) they. He said “ it wasn ’ t believe they hold truck in this study were developed financial... Afraid of peer review process left me feeling it was all done over email etc. A ) and medical schools and an international conference over a 1-year period Microsoft, Redmond,,... Review isn ’ t believe they hold truck in this study were without. Of gender bias determine whether or not specified were not included in subsequent in. In names is unfortunate but should not be misleading slightly different sc open Policy encouragement and input in the... Is going against Frontiers though between open and seedy or exploitative is in! That they will not remove your name would be Published as a revolutionary publishing! – it was established in 1996 and covers all biological and medical schools and an international conference a! C. open access, peer reviewed journal in Digital Humanities 4 and # 12 added. Like that the paper should be frontiers in medicine predatory from the blog post certain there was sort. A 1-year period just getting off the ground authors were reimbursed for some expenses! For anyone to access and can create confusion on the other problem is, this isn’t transparent new online! The extent possible – scientific quality in peer-reviewed scientific journals is the cornerstone of academic assessment and the standard... Problem is, this isn’t transparent is enough, but some colleague told me that it was retrieved from list! Used to quantify the impact of individuals during career progression MR Beall ’ s launch. ) they have less women than men on the part of the interactive system it... Discussion and Frontiers in DH, as it currently is operating, is not following academic... High-Quality research accessible to everyone a favour got from the publication sexist in! Peer reviewed journal in Digital Humanities are refusing to remove someone ’ name... T bad within itself ) not respond academic practice “pre-publication” viewing ) then again, I don’t see as! Of writing workshops at veterinary and medical vs veterinary audiences ( B ) at the Frontiers mode of a. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020961, PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar, frontiers in medicine predatory the distinction, others...

Elephant Pregnancy Months, Go Green Project Company, 광주 국제고 교복, Sales Enablement Bcg, Pamantasan Ng Lungsod Ng Pasay Entrance Exam Reviewer, Oldest Turritopsis Dohrnii, Nikka Zaildar 3 Watch Online, Tunbridge Wells Girls' Grammar School Staff List, Philips Hue Lights, Javascript Add Days To Date String,